欢迎来到51Due,请先 | 注册
关注我们: 51due论文代写二维码 51due论文代写平台微博
英国论文代写,英国essay代写知名品牌微信

更多范文

为您解决留学中生活、学习、工作的困难、疑惑
释放自我

英国论文代写范文精选-About executive compensation

2016-06-08 | 来源:51due教员组 | 类别:更多范文

51Due英国论文代写网精选assignment代写范文:“About executive compensation”,这篇论文讨论了关于高管薪酬的问题。高管薪酬一直是人们争议的对象。工资,福利,奖金,股票期权,养老金,递延收入和长期薪酬这些都是高管薪酬的一部分。此外,还有其他福利,比如:公司的汽车,金融咨询和税务筹划等。

In recent years, executive compensation has come under harsh scrutiny in literature and the media. Compensation structure and high salaries has brought this issue into the spotlight throughout the business world. Executive performance can directly affect shareholder value and the success of the organization.

This is why the alignment of an executive’s performance, salary, and benefits have long been under examination by financial experts. In this paper, I would like to examine the different types, and ways an executive’s compensation is calculated.

Executive compensation is not easily understood as there can be as many as a dozen or so variables such as: salary, bonus, benefits, stock options, pension contributions, deferred income, and long-term compensation.

Additionally, there can also be non-monetary benefits as well such as: company car, financial counseling, and tax preparation. Each of these variables in compensation are considered a type of pay, and how they are actually administered is called the mix of pay. Consideration of type and mix of pay precisely indicates the complexity of CEO compensation packages today.

Some potential potential determinants of type and mix of pay may include: firm strategy and life cycle, tax policy and the extent of agency problems within an organization. Additionally, because the pay of a CEO of a public organization is that of public information which is published annually, this may be used to make direct comparisons, and the availability of the pay information may serve as a guideline when examining the factors related to the potential CEO compensation package. Besides attracting and retaining the best talent in a CEO, it is also important that the CEO is able to address the individual organizations needs.

Directly responsible for determining the pay of a CEO, the Board of Directors or one of its committees to determine the role of the CEO and motivation which help to guide them through determining the appropriate type and mix of compensation. Nine out of ten large public companies have an executive compensation committee.

These committees usually consist of three to five outside directors who are responsible for establishing the mode of compensation and performance targets for top management.

“Firstly, compensation can be viewed as a function of supply and demand. Secondly, it can be viewed as a function of how much the executive is expected to contribute to the performance of the firm.” Two major determinants of CEO compensation are: market factors and the power and preferences of the board and CEO.

Additionally, along with the CEOs proven and expected contributions, market factors and the managerial labor market are important influences on the boards beliefs regarding the CEOs worth to the organization at that time.

These determinants each count for some variance in determining the appropriate compensation package that is in alignment with management and shareholder interest. Beyond market factors, CEO compensation can be influenced by political processes, as CEO and board members differ in power and preferences, the compensation determined will reflect those differences.

However, the strategy used should generate returns for investors, accurately measure management performance, and implement a pay practice that is fair to shareholders and drives business results.

Before the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee can determine the appropriate compensation package for their CEO, they must understand why effective managerial pay strategies are important to the organization, this is the role of the board under agency theory. An agency problem can occur when a CEO has no invested financial interest in the outcomes of his decisions.

This means that a CEO with no or minimal equity ownership would have substantially different goals than a CEO with equity ownership. Specifically when there is little or no ownership the incentive for the CEO could be to focus on maximizing their own wealth other than the organizations. Whereas a CEO with equity ownership will have incentives directly related to maximizing shareholder value.

CEO pay may also vary due to internal and external market influences. For example, the way the person becomes CEO may be reflected in the pay. CEOs recruited from outside the firm may require a premium in pay as incentive to switch firms, whereas those promoted internally may accept relatively les in pay for the status and privileges associated with the promotion. However, board members are very sensitive to paying less for an internal candidate than the competition so pay is usually raised to retain their service.

Critics argue that external successors may receive a premium in the form of non-contingent compensation, this could represent the external successors for fore-gone return to their old firm-specific skills, and for risk associated with the lack of new firm-specific skills. Most firms hire from within the organization for at least two reasons related to skills: First: firms value the resulting fit between the skills of the CEO and the organization and second, firms have better information about the skills of an internal than the external candidate.

In addition, the board is usually reluctant to turn outside an organization for a new CEO, as it is argued that this admits to internal deficiencies.

Firm size and firm performance may affect the choice of the successor and be linked directly to how they are compensated. Traditionally a CEOs main concern should be the maximization of shareholder value. However, stock price may not always be the best indicator of a CEOs contribution to the firm.

Trachial explains, “empirical evidence suggests that numerous economic factors render stock returns too noisy and insensitive to a manager’s actions to make it the primary factor is setting compensation”.In addition, Traichal suggests specifically that, shareholder returns and accounting returns be used for performance measurement. However Finkelstein and Hambrick suggest, that

A CEOs pay in bigger firms tend to pay more because the CEO oversees substantial resources, rather than the ability of the firm to pay more because of the number of their heiarchial pay levels. Additionally, Finkelstein and Hambrick argue that performance related programs are increasing.

These programs usually relate to meeting certain predetermined measures of performance, both personal and corporate. Typically, these programs extend over a period of years, but some are short-term. Traditionally a CEO may be paid based on results of prior years performance.

Beyond market factors, CEO compensation can be influenced by political processes, as CEO and board members differ in power and preferences, the compensation determined will reflect those differences.

要想了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要英国论文代写,请关注51Due英国论文代写平台,51Due是一家专业的留学教育辅导机构,专业辅导英国论文代写、assignment代写、essay代写、paper代写。在这里,51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育帮助服务,帮助留学生达成学业目标。如果您有论文代写需求,可以咨询我们的客服QQ800020041

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有;未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象,51Due保留一切法律追诉权。-ZR


我们的优势

  • 05年成立,已帮助上万人
  • 24小时专业客服
  • 团队成员都毕业于全球著名高校
  • 保证原创,支持检测

英国站