欢迎来到51Due,请先 | 注册
关注我们: 51due论文代写二维码 51due论文代写平台微博
英国论文代写,英国essay代写知名品牌微信

更多范文

为您解决留学中生活、学习、工作的困难、疑惑
释放自我

英国论文代写范文精选-Strategic analysis consulting firm

2016-06-27 | 来源:51due教员组 | 类别:更多范文

51Due英国论文代写网精选assignment代写范文: Strategic analysis consulting firm”,这篇论文讨论了咨询公司的战略分析。业务咨询顾问最为注重的就是细节,他们可以修改企业的内部流程,让企业获取到最大化利益,但奖金通常比不上战略专家。战略专家负责对公司重大交易提出建议:要公司采纳新的商业模式或其他重大事项。

“OPERATIONS consultants sit at the front of the classroom,” says a partner at a strategy consultancy. “Strategy consultants stay in the back, not paying attention, throwing paper airplanes. But they still get the girls and get rich.” Like so many caricatures, this one is cruel but contains a grain of truth.

Operations consultants—the fine-detail guys who tinker with businesses’ internal processes to make them run better—generally do not enjoy the same glamour or financial rewards as strategy specialists, whose job is to advise firms on make-or-break deals, adopting new business models and other big stuff. Although in practice their work overlaps, the two have until now remained distinct businesses.

Strategy firms like McKinsey, Bain and the Boston Consulting Group hire from the top universities, are packed with highly paid partners and whisper their counsel in CEOs’ ears. In contrast, operations specialists such as IBM, Accenture and the Big Four accounting firms employ armies of lower-paid grunts; and tend to answer to the client firm’s finance or tech chiefs. This year, however, that line has begun to blur. In January Deloitte became the largest of the Big Four by scooping up the assets of Monitor, a strategy firm that had gone bust.

And on October 30th its closest rival, PwC, said it would buy another strategy firm, Booz & Company, for a reported $1 billion. If Booz’s partners approve the deal, it will vault PwC back into first place. The accountancies’ push into strategy has been a decade in the making. During the late-1990s technology bubble they beefed up their IT-consulting arms. But in 2001 Enron, an energy-trading firm, went bust and took its auditor, Arthur Andersen, down with it.

In response, America’s Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate-governance reform, which banned firms from doing systems consulting for companies they audited. As a consolation prize, the Big Four made a fortune helping clients comply with the new law. Their advisory businesses, full of potential for conflicts of interest with their auditing side, by now seemed dispensable. All but Deloitte had sold off those divisions by 2003. Just as the workload from Sarbanes-Oxley began to dwindle, the 2008-09 financial crisis hit, causing consulting revenues to dip.

But once the economy recovered, the climate for the Big Four started to resemble the 1990s.

They began to rush back into consultancy, encouraged by its high margins and double-digit annual growth rates at a time when revenue growth from auditing and tax work had slowed. In particular, Deloitte and PwC began gobbling up operations consultancies as they sparred for the top spot. For years the strategy firms remained beyond the Big Four’s grasp.

During the 2000s they had mostly prospered on their own, and their partners shuddered at the thought of being subsumed into giant bureaucracies. After the financial crisis, however, midsized strategy consultants hit hard times. Cost-conscious companies with globalising businesses wanted either to hire boutiques with deep knowledge of their industries, or to benefit from the scale of generalist firms with offices everywhere.

Too big for some clients and too small for others, Monitor went under, and Booz—a spin-off from Booz Allen Hamilton, which now focuses on operations work for governments—went on the block. Both Booz and PwC say that the two sides of consulting are converging, and that more clients want a one-stop shop that can both devise a strategy and execute it. Deloitte and Monitor claim their integration is already bearing fruit. “There’s been a very healthy two-way cross-selling opportunity,” says Mike Canning of Deloitte. Nonetheless, Booz’s leadership still faces a hard sell to get the deal passed. In 2010 the company’s partners voted down a proposed merger with AT Kearney, another midsized strategy firm. This marriage involves far more risks.

A significant number of Booz’s clients would immediately be in doubt because PwC audits them—strategy consulting for audit clients is banned in many countries, and even where it is legal it is frowned upon. Since the Big Four are structured as associations of national partnerships, Booz’s staff would probably end up being divided by country, hindering the global co-operation that many big clients seek. Most important, each of Booz’s 300 partners would have to trade meaningful sway over the direction of a highly profitable firm for a minuscule stake in a diversified, lower-margin empire.

If the sale is approved, the test of its success will come in a few years, after Booz’s partners receive their full payout and can head off. An exodus would leave PwC empty-handed. The Big Four are also running a risk far greater than the cost of their purchases. A decade ago they placated regulators by retreating from advisory work. High-profile deals like the Booz-PwC tie-up put the conflict of interest between auditing and consulting back in the spotlight: after it was announced, Arthur Levitt, a former head of America’s Securities and Exchange Commission, warned that the firms were “slipping back” towards old, bad habits.

Any gains from pushing into strategy work might end up being outweighed by the cost of another regulatory crackdown.

要想了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要英国论文代写,请关注51Due英国论文代写平台,51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构,专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作,主要业务有英国论文代写、assignment代写、essay代写、paper代写。在这里,51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务,为广大留学生提升写作水平,帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有论文代写需求,可以咨询我们的客服QQ800020041

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有;未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象,51Due保留一切法律追诉权。-ZR

我们的优势

  • 05年成立,已帮助上万人
  • 24小时专业客服
  • 团队成员都毕业于全球著名高校
  • 保证原创,支持检测

英国站